Penn State Football
Syracuse - Penn State Summer Doldrums Preview
It should be noted that this game was scheduled when Syracuse was substantially more competitive (10-2 season). It gives me no pride or joy that Penn State is playing a cupcake. However, my honesty requires me to evaluate the opponent for what they are. You may find this preview harsher than my upcoming Eastern Illinois preview, but there is a certain level of expectation that is aligned to BCS teams (Syracuse) and FCS teams (EIU).
Syracuse is coming off a horrendous 3-9 season in 2008. This was following 1-10, 4-8, and 2-10 in the seasons between 2005 and 2007. What can be said about Syracuse? Basically, they barely belong in Div 1-A football at this point. Former head coach Greg Robinson ran Syracuse’s football program into the ground. Last year, it became completely clear that it was Robinson’s fault. It was his team, his coaching staff, and his recruits. Those were Greg Robinson’s loses.
While Robinson was finally fired, it doesn’t mean that Penn State won’t encounter him again. Robinson is the new defensive coordinator at Michigan. I’ll save more on that tidbit when I get to the Michigan preview.
|
Coaching career (HC unless noted)
|
||
|
1992 |
Cortland State (TE) |
|
Unlike Greg Robinson, Marrone has experience coaching college football. Despite this, Syracuse has an uphill battle as it needs to recruit talented players. Quite simply, Syracuse does not have quality players. They remain a cup cake. Marrone has been cleaning house at Syracuse, in what appears as making room for a huge class of fresh recruits. This is documented right here on Nittany Lounge in Doug Marrone is Cleaning House. So far 17 players have left SU’s football program since Marrone came to town.
It is not likely that Marrone can find talent at this point of the year to make up for that kind of attrition. There may be a few JUCO players out there, but he won’t find outstanding talent coming out of high school. Those players have already committed and signed to other teams. The players recruited by Robinson that haven’t left the team really form the basis of SU’s football team. To put it bluntly, they just are not impressive. Robinson was content with recruiting two-star talent. (14 in 2005, 15 in 2006, 17 in 2007, 18 in 2008, and 12 in 2009) It is not as if Marrone has significant improvement in 2009, SU had 12 two-star recruits and 2 three-star recruits to make up their entire recruiting class. As a point of comparison, Penn State averaged 3.6 two-star recruits between 2005 and 2009.
Syracuse's 2008 Season in Review
| Syracyse 2008 - 3-9-0 L1 | ||
| Date | Opponent |
Result |
| 8/30/08 | at Northwestern (9-4) | 10-30 L |
| 9/6/08 | Akron (5-7) | 42-28 L |
| 9/13/08 | Penn State (11-2) | 55-13 L |
| 9/20/08 | Northeastern (2-10) | 21-30 W |
| 9/27/08 | Pittsburgh (9-4) | 34-24 L |
| 10/04/08 | at West Virginia (9-4) | 6-217 L |
| 10/11/08 | at South Florida (8-5) | 13-45 L |
| 10/18/08 | Louisville (5-7) | 21-28 W |
| 11/05/08 | at Rutgers (8-5) | 17-35 L |
| 11/13/08 | Connecticut (8-5) | 39-14 L |
| 11/22/08 | at Notre Dame (7-6) | 24-23 W |
| 11/28/08 | at Cincinnati (11-3) | 10-30 L |
The highlight for Syracuse’s 2008 campaign was beating Notre Dame in South Bend. I certainly enjoyed it. There are few teams that I dislike more than Syracuse, and Notre Dame is one of them.
SU had two other wins in 2008, one against Northeastern and another against Louisville. I didn’t realize Northeastern had a football team. Apparently they don’t. As for Louisville, well, they are bottom dwellers with SU in the Big Least.
Syracuse also faced Penn State in head-to-head competition. Penn State destroyed Syracuse in 2008 55-13 in the rinky-dink Carrier Dome filled with Penn State fans. This year there will be 108,000+ Penn State fans providing Syracuse with a true deafening experience.
Syracyse Offense vs. PSU Defense
|
||||||
|
National Rankings
Category
|
SU
Actual
|
SU
Rank
|
PSU
Rank
|
PSU
Actual
|
National Rankings
Category
|
|
|
Scoring Offense
|
18.08
|
108
|
![]() |
8
|
14.38
|
Scoring Defense |
|
Total Offense
|
270.17 |
114
|
![]() |
8
|
280.08
|
Total Defense |
|
Passing Offense
|
121.50
|
113
|
![]() |
27
|
186.85
|
Pass Defense |
|
Passing Efficiency
|
94.95
|
113
|
![]() |
19
|
107.79
|
Pass Efficiency Defense |
|
Rushing Offense
|
148.67
|
55 | ![]() |
8
|
93.23
|
Rushing Defense |
|
Red Zone Offense Pct
|
.91
|
8 | ![]() |
97
|
.88
|
Red Zone Defense |
|
1st Down Offense/Game
|
13.67
|
118
|
![]() |
9
|
15.58
|
1st Down Defense |
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct
|
28.9
|
115
|
![]() |
15
|
32.2
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct Defense |
|
4th Down Conversion Pct
|
40.0
|
82
|
![]() |
87
|
54.2
|
4th Down Conversion Pct Defense |
|
Sacks Allowed/Game
|
2.42
|
98
|
![]() |
24
|
2.54
|
Sacks/Game |
|
Tackles For Loss Allowed
|
4.34
|
14
|
![]() |
44
|
46.23
|
Tackles For Loss/Game |
Syracuse scored against Penn State twice in the first half in last year’s match – two 44 yard field goals. In their best drive of the second half (59-yards), Syracuse scored a TD on an 11 yard pass. Overall, SU had a total of 8 first downs on the day.
It appears that Marrone is installing a spread offense, however Nassib was a standup QB at Malvern Prep. Also look for quarterback zone reads and a lot of bubble screens coming out of the new offense. During the spring this was effective against one of the worse defenses in college football (SU). It will be a different story when playing against Penn State.
Running back, Doug Houge and wide receiver Dan Sheeran moved to linebacker during spring practice. Sheeran didn’t like the move, so he left the football program. Gone is leading running back Curtis Brinkley (237 atts/1164 yards) to graduation. This leaves Antwon Bailey and Delone Carter as running backs. Bailey and Carter carried the ball 33 and 23 times respectively last season.
Syracuse’s passing offense was nearly non-existent last season. Their number one receiver, Donte Davis (29 rec/312 yards, 2 TDs) and number two receiver, Mike Owen (19 rec/175, 2 TDs), have graduated. We’ll have to see how the new receiving corps matches up with Penn State’s new defensive backfield. One thing for certain, the PSU’s defensive line will shell shock freshman QB Ryan Nassib.
Syracuse Defense vs. PSU Offense
|
||||||
|
National Rankings
Category
|
SU
Actual
|
SU
Rank
|
PSU
Rank
|
PSU
Actual
|
National Rankings
Category
|
|
|
Scoring Defense
|
32.67
|
101
|
![]() |
11
|
38.92
|
Scoring Offense |
|
Total Offense
|
414.50
|
101
|
![]() |
14
|
448.92
|
Total Offense |
|
Pass Defense
|
225.08 |
83
|
![]() |
37
|
243.08
|
Pass Offense |
|
Passing Efficiency Defense
|
141.12
|
101
|
![]() |
19
|
145.35
|
Pass Efficiency |
|
Rushing Defense
|
189.42
|
101
|
![]() |
17
|
205.85
|
Rushing Offense |
|
Red Zone Defense
|
.91
|
108
|
![]() |
6
|
.92
|
Red Zone Offense |
|
1st Down Defense
|
22.50
|
104
|
![]() |
18
|
23.08
|
1st Down Offense/Game |
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct Defense
|
51.2
|
117
|
![]() |
6
|
52.0
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct |
|
4th Down Conversion Pct Defense
|
81.3
|
116
|
![]() |
88
|
38.5
|
4th Down Conversion Pct |
|
SacksGame
|
1.33
|
100
|
![]() |
4
|
21.00
|
Sacks Allowed |
|
Tackles For Loss/Game
|
4.67
|
104
|
![]() |
4
|
3.85
|
Tackles For Loss Allowed |
Cupcake number two will provide another week of practice for Penn State’s inexperienced offensive line as they prepare for conference play in week four of the season. Despite PSU’s offensive line's inexperience, this is clearly a mismatch between SU and PSU. Penn State’s offensive line has experience, just not together. They are high quality, high caliber linemen that simply need some reps together.
In last year’s game, Penn State had 560 offensive yards against SU. 344 of the yards came from passing. That came in Daryll Clark’s second game as a starting QB. Clark is now well seasoned and comfortable with his offense. Syracuse is starting essentially the same defensive backfield as last year, with the exception of Nico Scott.
The best case scenario for SU is that they will have had one game of true feedback - Minnesota. This bodes well for Penn State’s passing game and offense in general. It is highly probable that PSU will have similar statistics, if not better statistics than last year.
Turnovers - Time of Possession - Penalties
|
||||||
|
National Rankings
Category
|
SU
Actual
|
SU
Rank
|
PSU
Rank
|
PSU
Actual
|
National Rankings
Category
|
|
| Turnover Margin |
-.08
|
67
|
![]() |
25
|
.54 | Turnover Margin |
|
Turnover Gained
|
16
|
104
|
![]() |
14
|
16 | Turnovers Lost |
|
Turnovers Lost
|
17
|
18
|
![]() |
58
|
23 | Turnovers Gained |
|
Fumbles Recovered
|
8
|
84
|
![]() |
49
|
10
|
Fumbles Lost |
|
Fumbles Lost
|
9
|
37
|
![]() |
97
|
7 | Fumbles Recovered |
|
Passes Intercepted
|
8 |
98
|
![]() |
4 | 6 | Passes had Intercepted |
|
Passed had Intercepted
|
8
|
13
|
![]() |
26
|
16 | Passes Intercepted |
|
Fewest Penalties/Game
|
4.50
|
14
|
![]() |
3
|
3.77 | Fewest Penalties/Game |
|
Fewest Yards Penalized/Game
|
38.33
|
14
|
![]() |
3
|
31.38 | Fewest Yards Penalized/Game |
|
Time of Possession
|
27:15
|
112
|
![]() |
16
|
31:44
|
Time of Possession |
One statistic stands out from above – Syracuse’s time of possession: 27:15. Which is actually higher than the 24:54 TOP that they had against Penn State in last year’s game. Syracuse needs to improve this statistic if it hopes to be even competitive against Penn State. The only way for SU to do that is to run the ball, which they may do, but they will not be converting first downs running the ball in 2 yard increments. SU averaged only 2 yards per carry against PSU last year.
Special Teams
|
||||||
|
National Rankings
Category
|
SU
Actual
|
SU
Rank
|
PSU
Rank
|
PSU
Actual
|
National Rankings
Category
|
|
|
Punt Returns
|
4.45
|
114
|
![]() |
15
|
5.33
|
Punt Return Defense |
|
Punt Return Defense
|
10.58
|
83
|
![]() |
39
|
10.36
|
Punt Returns |
|
Net Punting
|
37.42
|
22
|
![]() |
11
|
37.86
|
Net Punting |
|
Kickoff Returns
|
22.04
|
42
|
![]() |
65
|
21.26
|
Kickoff Return Defense |
|
Kickoff Return Defense
|
24.91
|
108
|
![]() |
10
|
24.54
|
Kickoff Returns |
Special teams are another area that Syracuse needs to address. As it stands, Syracuse will continue to have poor field position making it difficult to score. The inverse is true for Penn State. Just eyeing last year statistics, you would think a coach would zero in on the 108th and 83rd rankings for kickoff and punt return defense. Penn State should be spending some additional time on kick/punt returns leading into this game. Syracuse will be busy working on the fundamentals of their offense and defense. Given the attrition that has occurred at SU, something has to give. The vast majority of play isn’t on special teams, so SU has to dedicate their remaining players to the majority of the game. SU can’t expect to play their best players on every down and also special teams. Their weaker players will be on special teams – PSU needs to capitalize.
Iowa is the fourth game on the schedule. This means two more weeks to get the offensive line in shape. I expect to see the first string to play the vast majority of the game to gain experience and game conditioning. This means that Penn State should be able to run at will throughout the game. Another year of experience for Royster and Green and these numbers should go up. Last year, Evan Royster ran for 104 yards on only 13 carries. Even if Carter and Beachum come into the game late, they should be able to run up some yards.
It isn’t talked about much, but very quietly, Penn State has amassed a stable of tailbacks that all could start on most teams. When you have running game balanced by passing, you end up with high scores against cupcakes.
Syracuse is the week two cupcake. My prediction is Syracuse will lose worse than last year. Penn State is capable of scoring more than 60 points – it will be difficult not to score that many points. The only way that this won’t happen is if JoePa goes conservative on offense in the second half.
Quote this article on your siteTo create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.
Preview :





Comments